From those images it doesn't seem that indecent to me, just a couple inches of shorts. The law includes exposure of undies and/or skin... so what if someones wearing a short top that exposes the belly, seems like the same thing to me. I understand some may find saggy pants intimidating, for example down here in New Zealand all our gangs wear huge gang patches on the backs or wear very distinctive colours, but coming from my point of view saggy pants are a fashion choice. The law seems very ambiguous and could be misused.
I guess i just don't "get it".
Really insanely stupid law. God forbid those poor folks ever find themselves at the beach.
ReplyDeleteI know you care deeply about this issue, so I bring you an update:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.redorbit.com/news/oddities/1559571/judge_strips_away_towns_ban_on_saggy_pants/index.html?source=r_oddities
Saggy pants are back baby!
Lol, saggy trousers, saggy saggy trousers. Thanks for the update GL, it's nice to see some logic in the world.
ReplyDelete